[ILUG-BOM] [Flame Bait] Open Office not upgradable in Linux but possible in Windows.

Kenneth Gonsalves lawgon at au-kbc.org
Mon Jun 22 09:43:34 IST 2009


On Monday 22 June 2009 09:29:40 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves<lawgon at au-kbc.org> wrote:
> > where is the source for this allegation? In the definition of Open Source
> > given in the link above, they make 10 points and none of them 'making
> > entry easier for business'. You may not like Open Source or may disagree
> > with it's goals, but you cannot mislabel it as you are doing. This is the
> > definition:
> >
> > http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd
>
> No, you're misunderstanding my point. It does not make entry easier
> for business. It does two things:

I have understood your point - you want to spread FUD
>
> 1) Put things in a "business friendly" language. It's like making meat
> flavoured spinach to please the dog.
> 2) Includes licenses that do not preserve the freedom of the developer

more FUD

-- 
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/


More information about the Linuxers mailing list