[ILUG-BOM] Please use appropriate subject line (Was Re: Fwd: [PLUG] GNUnify '11)
Raj Mathur ( राज माथुर )
raju at linux-delhi.org
Wed Feb 2 19:45:14 IST 2011
On Wednesday 02 Feb 2011, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Nitesh Mistry <mailbox at mistrynitesh.net>:
> > the messages with pgp keys is more meaningful than you just writing
> > your name below every message. Because anybody can write any name
> > below the message, but nobody other than me can pgp sign a message
> > with key id A6FEF696. If you want a proof that the name mentioned
> > on the key A6FEF696 is really Nitesh Mistry, you are always
> > welcome to meet me and I can give all the documents in the world
> > to prove it (and no I won't bite you ;) ).
> The point from day one is that it carries no additional meaning in a
> mailing list context; all you are doing is reducing the S/N. If you
> cannot grasp that, why bother?
I don't agree that signing messages is reducing S/N on a list. PGP/GPG
signing does accomplish the following:
- Encourage more people to ask questions about and hopefully adopt
privacy-friendly practices in public communications.
- Establish a non-repudiable ownership of the content of the message.
- Establish prior art in case you put an idea into a message which
I sign messages to mailing lists on a regular (if infrequent) basis,
never had a complaint yet.
Of course, if Nitesh' key isn't available for download from a keyserver
then the effectiveness of the signing does go down, but it still serves
the same basic functions.
Raj Mathur raju at kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mm.glug-bom.org/pipermail/linuxers/attachments/20110202/89c81a30/attachment.pgp
More information about the Linuxers